Sitemap

Member-only story

Making the rules explicit becomes more critical shifting from co-located to remote

2 min readMar 21, 2021

--

Read this story without a paywall

Press enter or click to view image in full size
Harder to rely on role modeled behaviour for unwritten rules when remote

“No unwritten rules” is Gitlab’s simpler expression of what the Kanban community would call “make process policies explicit”. Being explicit about “how things are done here” is worthwhile whether co-located or not. It levels the playing field for people who don’t necessarily have exposure to hidden interactions. Remote makes this more critical because it can be more difficult to see how people are behaving.

Distribute decision-making with context and decision rules

Press enter or click to view image in full size
Options for remote decision-making

Distributing decision-making makes organisations more responsive. This is true whether the organisation is co-located or remote. Centralised decision-making in a remote context is slower and more difficult to monitor. This does not mean that shifting to remote automatically makes effective distributed decision-making the default. To get trustworthy distributed decision-making, all the distributed decision-makers need to be supported with both context and guidance (aka decision rules, “guard rails”, etc.).

Make the product…

--

--

Jason Yip
Jason Yip

Written by Jason Yip

Director Technical Product Management Infrastructure Platforms at Grainger. Extreme Programming, Agile, Lean guy. Ex-Spotify, ex-ThoughtWorks.